Corporal Punishment
Related Data
- Adrian Peterson, a Pro Bowl running back for the Minnesota Vikings, has been accused of child abuse for stuffing the leaves of a branch into his 4-year-old son’s mouth and then hitting him with a switch (the leafless branch) across the backs of his bare legs leaving open wounds.
- Children who experience physical punishment are 59 percent more likely to have alcohol dependence, 41 percent more likely to have depression and 24 percent more likely to have panic disorder, compared with those who received no physical punishments. (Huffington Post, Spanking Children & Mental Health: Punishment Linked To Disorders Later In Life)
- 94% of parents of three and four-year-olds claim to have spanked their children in the past year. (childtrendsdatabank.org, as quoted in the NYT, 9-17-2014, Charles Blow)
- 77% percent of men and 65% of women between the ages of 18 and 65 agree that sometimes what a child needs is a “good hard spanking.” (childtrendsdatabank.org, as quoted in the NYT, 9-17-2014, Charles Blow)
- Spanking increases children’s long-term aggression towards peers and others. (NYT, George W. Holden, 8-14-2011)
- Studies attribute the use of corporal punishment to critical factors, like the parents’ upbringing, stress levels, religious beliefs, socioeconomic status and region of the country. These have shown that parents most adamantly committed to the practice of spanking tend to be from the South. They have less education and less wealth, and they experience more stress. (NYT, George W. Holden, 8-14-2011)
Sample Frame
Maybe some of you watch football, or at least have been following the controversies arising around violence off the field. I want to comment on this because I think it’s directly connected to powerful work that we’re doing here.
The latest controversy about violence off the field involves Adrian Peterson. He’s a Pro Bowl running back for the Minnesota Vikings. He was accused recently of child abuse for disciplining his four-year-old son with a switch (a leafless tree branch.) He is currently suspended from play while his team waits to see what happens legally before they decide on longer term employment consequences, if any.
While many would agree that the beating that Peterson gave his son was over the line, this situation has brought up a national dialogue about corporal punishment in general. There is well-documented evidence that it’s happening widely across racial lines. Ninety-four percent of parents of three and four-year-olds claim to have spanked their children in the past year. Seventy-seven percent of men and 65% of women between the ages of 18 and 65 agree that sometimes what a child needs is a “good hard spanking.”
There is much evidence that the effects of corporal punishment are negative for the child. The number of problem behaviors in adolescence is related to the amount of spanking a child receives. Spanking increases children’s long-term aggression towards peers and others. Children who experienced physical punishment were 59 percent more likely to have alcohol dependence, 41 percent more likely to have depression and 24 percent more likely to have panic disorder, compared with those who received no physical punishments.
On top of this quantitative data, we know that violence begets violence. Children learn what they live. If they experience violence at home when an adult is angry, we see that same kind of behavior at school. I would presume that many people sitting in this room were hit or spanked as kids. I presume that some of us may have hit children ourselves. We are evolving as a people. Just as our pedagogy is evolving as we learn more and more about how traditional pedagogy doesn’t work for all kids, so is our approach to discipline that yields improvement rather than shame. Many of us didn’t sit in car seats as children—we have evolved as a people as statistics have revealed the danger for children unrestrained in cars.
There is a temptation to conclude that this is a problem in the Black community since the person on the hot-seat at this moment is an African American football player. Several commentators have warned us in the last week to be careful about this conclusion. Given the statistics that I just quoted, this is a national problem—let us not create, as Jamelle Bouie of Slate urges, a Black pathology around corporal punishment. Yes it’s alive and well in the Black community and it’s alive and well in other racial communities in our midst. There are, however, significant socio-economic and geographic patterns—the higher the education level of the parents, the lower the chances that the parents will physically punish their children; more corporal punishment happens in the South than anywhere else. When we see patterns that emerge based on socio-economic status, we also must consider that violence is often the result of internalized oppression over generations.
Given how prevalent corporal punishment is in our society and how deeply ingrained it is, and given how much researchers know about its negative effects on children, how will this pattern change? It starts to change with us. We have communicated very clear expectations for our students and implemented Restorative Practices because we believe in the redemptive power of dialogue, empathy, and the chance to restore justice rather than the old model of punishment, which yields more shame and anger than anything else. A child who has been punished as the primary form of discipline—whether it’s a loss of recess, in-house suspension, writing lines, or cleaning the cafeteria, let alone getting hit—does not often re-engage in learning feeling restored, resolved, and ready, in the short term or in the long term. We have seen much evidence that the restorative approach works. (Insert an example of a situation at the school in which Restorative Practices yielded justice and redemption.) At school, we want our students to see the process and the results of Restorative Practices—hopefully from when they are in kindergarten through when they graduate as seniors.
Schools are often where social change begins and sustains. What if the current generation of young people experiences the power of restorative justice and makes restorative discipline choices when they become parents themselves? What if members of this generation take the helm of the criminal justice system and move it from the horribly punitive and ineffective system it is now to one of learning, dialogue, restoration, redemption, and support? That would mean that so many of our young men of color coming from backgrounds in poverty might not be destined for endless years in prison—it could mean that there were reasonable, fair, redemptive ways for them to take responsibility, make restitution, acquire the education and support and medical attention necessary for responsible living, and re-enter society.
As with so many aspects of our society, the prospect of the better future begins with us. Here’s to our passionate and dedicated work with Restorative Practices.